Some People Never Learn Some People Never Learn
Tuesday, January 22, 2008 - Einat Rotman
Home >> News >> General Science
  Peralink
Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig, Germany have found a genetic factor that affects our ability to learn from our errors. The scientists demonstrated that men carrying the A1 mutation, which reduces the amount of dopamine D2 receptors in the brain, are less successful at learning to avoid mistakes than men who do not carry this genetic mutation. This finding has the potential to improve our understanding of the causes of addictive and compulsive behaviors.
Submit item to:   Del.icio.us Add to: Del.icio.us  Digg Add to: Digg  StumbleUpon Add to: StumbleUpon   Reddit Add to: Reddit   Slashdot Add to: Slashdot   More Bookmarks

An illustration of a dopamine molecule (Credit: Stanford University) 
An illustration of a dopamine molecule
(Credit: Stanford University)
Some people do not give up even when they do not succeed.Theyrefuse to accept defeat and continue to try even when common sense tells others there's no use in trying. 

Tilmann Klein and Dr. Markus Ullsperger at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig, Germany, believe they have found the genetic cause for this "stubbornness". They discovered that a single genetic mutation can determine whether people repeat their mistakes. This mutation, named the A1 mutation, is found in about one-third of the population and causes a reduction in the amount of D2 receptors in the brain, which are the docking sites for dopamine.

Dopamine is a neurotransmitter – a chemical participating in the relay of signals between nerve cells and target cells. Among other behavior and cognition functions, dopamine plays a key role in the process of learning, in the feeling of pleasure, and in motivation and reward (i.e. learning to repeat behaviors that maximize rewards).

The researchers theorized that the lower output of dopamine in people with fewer D2 receptors leads them to repeat their mistakes, while people with more D2 receptors comprehend that a certain action is a mistake the first time they carry it out and do not feel any desire to repeat it. To examine this theory, Klein and Ullsperger studied 26 healthy men, half of which carried the A1 gene variant (allele). 

At first, the volunteers were shown sets of two symbols and were asked to select one. Each choice was followed by positive or negative feedback represented by a smiling or frowning face, respectively. The researchers then tested whether the men had learnt to choose the symbol that had the most positive feedback and avoid the one that led to the most negative feedback.

 The probabilistic learning task given to the subjects participating in the research, and its results. (Credit: Max-Planck Institute for Neurological Research)
The probabilistic learning task given
to the subjects participating in
the research, and its results.
(Credit: Max-Planck Institute
for Neurological Research)
The test showed that men carrying the A1 mutation responded less to negative feedback, implying that they were less successful at learning to avoid mistakes than the men in the other group. Brain imaging of both groups also supported this result, revealing that during the learning sessions the men carrying the A1 mutation had diminished neurological activity in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), an area in the brain involved in monitoring errors.

"Our subjects worked in an artificial laboratory setting, the reward and punishment they received was highly abstract, whereas a real world situation in which you could learn from feedback is normally much more complex. More research is needed to show how our findings apply to real world situations," Klein says.  

According to the German team, the decreased sensitivity to negative consequences of actions as a result of D2 receptor reduction may also explain why the A1 gene variant has previously been linked to addictive and compulsive behaviors. Even so, "It's our strong belief that the variant we investigated here is not the only cause for example of an addiction - but maybe it contributes to a predisposition for developing an addiction," Klein stresses. 

TFOT previously covered a similar experiment that demonstrated the connection between high levels of brain activity and the placebo effect (reward anticipation).  

The press release of the German team's finding is available in this webpage of the Max-Planck Institute for Neurological Research.

Related News Do Monkeys 'Pay' for Sex? Do Monkeys 'Pay' for Sex? Electronic Structure of DNA Revealed Electronic Structure of DNA Revealed

Related Pictures 2007 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2007 Nobel Prize in Chemistry Programmable Bending Polymers Programmable Bending Polymers

Other Articles The Future of Electronic Paper The Future of Electronic Paper 2007 In Technology 2007 In Technology


Submit item to:   Del.icio.us Add to: Del.icio.us  Digg Add to: Digg  StumbleUpon Add to: StumbleUpon   Reddit Add to: Reddit   Slashdot Add to: Slashdot  
Add to: Technorati   Add to: Netscape   Add to: Newsvine   Add to: Mr. Wong Add to: Webnews Add to: Icio Add to: Oneview Add to: Folkd Add to: Yigg Add to: Linkarena Add to: Simpy Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Information


Comments & Replies (10)
dopamine receptors   (01/25/08 - 0:42 - by Rene)
I do not understand how an unwillingness to give up--stubborness-- is
termed a failure to learn from one's mistakes.
Never giving up is
the number one recipe for success.
Not giving up vs. not learning   (01/25/08 - 2:39 - by Robert)
There is a big difference between not giving up and not learning.
Stubbornly doing the same thing or taking the same approach over and
over again, despite negative feedback each time is not the key to
success. The key to success is modifying your approach or picking a
different, more realistic goal when faced with repeated failure.
learning = giving up?   (01/25/08 - 3:45 - by Shannon)
Um...giving up in the face of \\\'failure\\\' presumes each attempt is
\\\"identical\\\" to the previous. That\\\'s virtually never true.
Persistence and refusing to give up are also hallmarks of genius.


Perhaps it has to do with the relative \\\'value\\\' placed on the
\\\"negative feedback\\\". But how many men would succeed if they gave
up after 1 wrong answer. Repetition of results, good or bad, is
scientific \\\"research\\\". Giving up after too-few tries results in
an overall higher failure rate.
Also -- not sure about the relation
to addiction. Addiction is usually caused dopamine stimulation, but if
A1 variation humans have fewer dopamine receptors, wouldn\\\'t that
mean they wouldn\\\'t be as greatly affected by addictive drugs?
Perhaps it is the humans without the A1 variation that are more
susceptible to \\\"addictive\\\" behaviors since they perceive the
differences in dopamine reinforcement more clearly?
Wow.   (01/25/08 - 8:06 - by Naery)
Really, no need for abstraction, just check if the A1 mutation is
present in compulsive casino and lottery players/buyers.

Those
guys/girls will always do the same thing:

1 - Today I feel
lucky.
2 - Some other guy DID win.
3 - Buy some tickets.
4 -
Lose.
5 - Repeat from number 1.

All this even when presented with
the statistical evidence and concrete evidence that you CANNOT make
money out of gambling, the house always wins...

Now THAT is what I
call failure to learn from mistake. It's not about perseverance, it's
about being stupidly hopeful in the face of reality.
That's insane!   (01/25/08 - 11:43 - by Mike Streck)
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
different results. - Albert Einstein
Does Bush have this mutation?   (01/25/08 - 12:02 - by W P Gardner)
Can someone find out whether President Bush has this mutation in his
genes?
Insanity, AI, Stubborness   (01/25/08 - 14:11 - by Jess)
I believe Robert explained it perfectly. I concur. Kudos Robert!
current white house staff   (01/25/08 - 14:38 - by dubya)
i think they should test the "stay the course" fellows in the white
house right now, they don't seem to learn from there mistakes.
Sometimes you need both factors!   (01/26/08 - 16:15 - by epat)
Not giving up and learning from mistakes are both factors in playing a
musical instrument for example! I play piano and sometimes I will have
to play the same passage over 200-300 times before I get it note
perfect! Some notes will go wrong in the same way every time, so
learning from mistakes is vital to minimise the number of notes that
this happens to! Also, the more mistakes you learn from, the more
likely you are to be able to recover if you accidentally slip up on
the night itself! People that give up after 5 tries never make it to
be top musicians! Having said that, if some problem persists, I will
eventually try tackling it from a different angle! It just depends on
what you class as giving up!

I think the kind of thing they're
talking about here is actually less to do with giving up and more to
do with carrying on! Not giving up at something that yields a positive
outcome in the end is very different from carrying on with something
that is always going to be negative!

~epat
Evidence and conclusion   (02/07/08 - 12:50 - by Ian)
They have clearly found something interesting here but, as the
discussion above shows, the conclusion
drawn is less firm.

Picture Of The Day
SmellyPhone
SmellyPhone

Site Of The Week
Robot Hall of Fame
Robot Hall of Fame

Personal Column
Orffyreus and Leibniz - Part 2
Ran Levi
Orffyreus and Leibniz - Part 2

Book Review
The Bomb that Never Was
The Bomb that Never Was




Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Site Profile
Copyright © 2007 The Future of Things. All rights reserved.