Mini-Mag Orion Will Reach for the Stars Mini-Mag Orion Will Reach for the Stars
Thursday, September 20, 2007 - Sarah Gingichashvili
Home >> News >> Space
  Peralink
Andrews Space & Technology (AS&T) introduced an innovative propulsion system that could significantly shorten round trips from Earth to Mars (from two years to only six months!) and enable our spaceships to reach Jupiter after one year of space traveling. The system, which may dramatically affect interplanetary space travel is called the Miniature Magnetic Orion (Mini-Mag Orion for short), and is an optimization of the 1958 Orion interplanetary propulsion concept.
Submit item to:   Del.icio.us Add to: Del.icio.us  Digg Add to: Digg  StumbleUpon Add to: StumbleUpon   Reddit Add to: Reddit   Slashdot Add to: Slashdot   More Bookmarks

 The Mini-Mag Orion interstellar concept, a hybrid starship accelerated by beamed pellet propellants, and decelerated with a magnetic sail. Credit: Roger Lenard/Dana Andrews; Andrews Space.
The Mini-Mag Orion interstellar concept, a hybrid
starship accelerated by beamed pellet propellants,
and decelerated with a magnetic sail
(Credit: Roger Lenard/Dana Andrews; Andrews Space)
The original Orion project was headed by Ted Taylor from General Atomics, who together with the famous physicist Freeman Dyson suggested ejecting nuclear explosives behind a spacecraft in order to propel it forward. The Mini-Mag system uses a magnetic field in order to trigger an explosion of compressed material in the form of small pellets weighing several grams. This explosion, although being significantly weaker than a nuclear explosion, creates plasma that is directed through a magnetic nozzle to generate vehicle thrust. The proposed technology enables the production of thrust at high efficiency, hopefully allowing drastic reduction of interplanetary travel time. According to calculations performed by AS&T, this type of propulsion system can produce the same thrust as the Space Shuttle Main Engine, with 50 times more efficiency.

Due to the magnetic compression thrust technology, spacecraft could be smaller and lighter. The spacecraft itself will only have to carry a relatively small amount of fissionable material as fuel and will be able to reach speeds of approximately 10% of the speed of light. Dr. Dana Andrews, AS&T Chief Technology Officer and Mini-Mag Orion inventor, and Roger Lenard from the Sandia National Laboratories, have published a paper describing their research into the Mini-Mag Orion concept in the  Acta Astronautica – Journal of the International Academy of Astronautics.

In the framework of their research into the subject, the scientists conducted an experiment that tested the process of compressing a simulated fissile material in a magnetic field. "The experiment validated the physical process behind the MMO concept, substantiating MMO's potential of enabling shorter interplanetary trip time for near-term space travel" - said AS&T Principal Investigator Ralph Ewig. "We are still far from constructing an actual vehicle, but the present research will chart the course for human missions to other planets in the near future. The Mini-Mag Orion system shows significant promise, and the successful completion of our experiment demonstrated the physics and validated our approach for a near-term, in-space, advanced propulsion system," said Dr. Andrews.

The MMO study has been funded by the NASA Phase II Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) and was conducted in cooperation with Sandia National Laboratories and the University of Washington’s Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

 Mini–Mag Orion Design
Mini–Mag Orion Design (Credit: Andrews Space)

In 2006, TFOT covered a different revolutionary space propulsion technology developed by the Santa Fe Positronics Research Company. The company also worked with NASA on a concept for an anti matter engine, which uses positrons (anti-electrons) as a fuel that will enable a spaceship to reach Mars faster than any known conventional propulsion technology. 

Related News The Sky is Falling or Much Ado About Nothing The Sky is Falling or Much Ado About Nothing In Search of the Tunguska Meteorite In Search of the Tunguska Meteorite

Related Pictures STS-122 Atlantis Mission Takes Off STS-122 Atlantis Mission Takes Off Space Money Space Money

Other Articles CES 2008 Innovations Coverage CES 2008 Innovations Coverage Green Computing Green Computing


Submit item to:   Del.icio.us Add to: Del.icio.us  Digg Add to: Digg  StumbleUpon Add to: StumbleUpon   Reddit Add to: Reddit   Slashdot Add to: Slashdot  
Add to: Technorati   Add to: Netscape   Add to: Newsvine   Add to: Mr. Wong Add to: Webnews Add to: Icio Add to: Oneview Add to: Folkd Add to: Yigg Add to: Linkarena Add to: Simpy Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Information


Comments & Replies (47)
oh great, the new pollution   (09/20/07 - 23:48 - by Dave Taylor)
Can't wait for this to be so popular that the next travelers get to
enjoy the exhaust of the last travelers.

And I also can't wait for
the first airborne failure of a launch vehicle.

Just sounds like a
brilliantly bad idea.

Space the final frontier   (09/21/07 - 0:06 - by Shatner)
Still waiting for the ION drive...

And for those concerned about
pollution, don't you have a tree to grope somewhere.
Airborne failure...   (09/21/07 - 0:25 - by Garry)
For those concerned about pollution, a spacecraft powered by this fuel
source would not be launched from a ground station but from orbit...
Sorry, but   (09/21/07 - 0:41 - by Matt)
there was news about how laser propulsion is now ready to shorten
trips to mars into just under a week. You can read about it in
http://dialog.newsedge.com/newsedge.asp?site=2006121916143901110346&bl
ock
=folderstory&briefs=off&action=XMLStoryResult&smd=true&storyid=p0
906509.2
rw&rtcrdata=off

I'm quite sure that this other technology
will also prove it's benefits in space cargo etc, mut on a manned
mission to mars, the time to get there and back is too critical.
And don't forget ...   (09/21/07 - 2:05 - by Patrick James)
Can't wait for teleportation
...

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/19/0557252
Dont put fissiles in space   (09/21/07 - 2:07 - by Neil Farbstein)
Dont pollute space with fissile material dropped out of the back of
spacecraft a piece could fall on you!
degree of risk   (09/21/07 - 2:44 - by Catodon)
REad Goerge Dysons account of the original ORION. Lauched from orbit
the stats apparently worked out that one person in the world somewhere
and untracably would die for each from orbit orion launch. Questions:
What is acceptable cost? (brigde and dam builders in the 50's often
expected a higher casualty rate than this) blah blah.
2: how much
less fissionable material and how does this risk compare to background
radiation in space and shielding?
Numbers people.
A good step   (09/21/07 - 3:11 - by Andrew)
I believe that colonizing other planets is the most important thing
any human could accomplish. Earth is a finite resource, and if we get
out into space, Earth may die, but human kind will live on. Yes there
are problems on Earth, and there always will be. This is an awesome
reworking of an already stellar method of getting warm bodies out
among the planets, and maybe, given a big enough craft, out among the
stars.
Ammm ... what space pollution   (09/21/07 - 4:04 - by Giorgis)
Ammm ... what pollution, it\'s space out there, everything is moving.
It\'s not like a path in the forest. Space is so big our affect is
like a scratch on a grain of sand on planet earth. Then next point is
even if we do cross that path a day later the radiation is a minuscule
component to what we protect our selves from in space. Thrust guys,
it\'s like your worried you will fry if you fly in the same
atmosphere than the shuttle took off in. And that is 1000 times worse
Space Pollution?   (09/21/07 - 4:27 - by John)
Sorry to rain on the parade of the space environmentalists. If you
think that the gamma radiation created from one (or a thousand) of
these space craft, the hazards from these craft is nothing compared to
the hazards coming from our sun. The sun emits such a large amount of
ionizing radiation (gamma rays) that as of now there is concern as to
weather a mars mission is even possible - without the crew dieing from
radiation poisoning.
Ermmm   (09/21/07 - 4:54 - by D)
Eh hmmm... why don't they put up exactly what they're working on.
about freaking time   (09/21/07 - 5:31 - by Dave)
I hope they do this properly. That way, it can become the first true
and ideally permanent spaceship. I'd expect the engine to be built to
last, and to be reused for trips to the moon, mars and beyond.
lol   (09/21/07 - 6:15 - by crypt2121)
[Just sounds like a brilliantly bad idea]

Yeah, we won't want
fission or fusion explosions in space ... duh!
Are you serious?   (09/21/07 - 7:05 - by Sterk)
"[Just sounds like a brilliantly bad idea]

Yeah, we won't want
fission or fusion explosions in space ... duh!"

I really, really
hope that is sarcasm as that is what happens everyday in the universe.
Stars are constantly being birthed and falling victim to their own
inevitable demise by way of massive explosions resulting in immense
amounts of ionized particles and gamma rays. Not to mention we all
know that black holes and quasars are emitting more radiation than
anything else we've observed! I don't think we have to worry about
radiation pollution. As it was stated prior, the universe is full of
it, and that won't change, in fact if we could unfold space/time to
get to the bottom of the vast amount of energy in every cubic
millimeter of vacuum space we'll never need another energy source.
Pollute the space?   (09/21/07 - 8:35 - by Roberto)
We can pollute the earth and the orbit around it.
We can NOT pollute
the space. It is not in our abilities and never will be. The universe
is large and we are nothing. Only people without a basic notion of
astronomy can think that. Go and study a bit what the universe is...
polluting space   (09/21/07 - 10:06 - by crypt2121)
[I really, really hope that is sarcasm as that is what happens
everyday in the universe.]

Yes, it is.

I just can't get enough
of the "anti-nuke in space" and "don't dirty the universe"
crew.

Certainly we can taint the space around a world (gravity and
all) but to suggest we can effect the radioactive backdop of the
Universe with a few fission, fusion, or even matter/anti-matter
reactions is just, well, out there...

not quite   (09/21/07 - 10:14 - by PhysicsGuy)
What with all the protons the sun emits in the solar wind, high energy
cosmic rays etc, and so on and so forth, I tend to think there would
be lingering exhaust plumes from previous flights that would be *more*
dangerous. Space is *filled* with radiation, after all.
Mini Mag   (09/21/07 - 10:28 - by ASman)
This SBIR was submitted a while ago, like 4-5 yrs ago if I'm not
mistaken, so yes many new technologies have come out that could be
better. Laser technology is one. That's how it goes. But its still a
step forward which is what is the most important part of this project.
And besides it can have full autonomy way past the usable range of a
laser thats earth bound and then you have the line of sight issue,
same with communications.
not quite   (09/21/07 - 10:28 - by PhysicsGuy)
What with all the protons the sun emits in the solar wind, high energy
cosmic rays etc, and so on and so forth, I tend to think there would
be lingering exhaust plumes from previous flights that would be *more*
dangerous. Space is *filled* with radiation, after all.
Radiation   (09/21/07 - 11:20 - by Guy)
The use of magnetic compression thrust technology is an interesting
however I wonder why materials published so far don't mention anything
about residual radiation and it's duration.
Does anyone have any
ideas where to look?
On Pollution   (09/21/07 - 11:30 - by Iridian)
I think pollution here refers more to very high velocity projectiles
resulting from this propulsion. Not much unlike the amount of high
velocity crap orbiting earth as a result of all space missions so far.
Even if the space is big, if the space activity ever gets popular,
statistically accidents will happen, especially if the optimal travel
paths are narrow.
On Pollution again   (09/21/07 - 11:35 - by Iridian)
Actually, disregard my previous post. Didn't read the text closely
enough. If the pellets are indeed exploded and results in plasma
emission, there wont be any projectiles to speak of, as the plasma
will disperse very quickly when in space.
Silly people   (09/21/07 - 12:46 - by Matt)
Ion drive already exists. Learn to research. It is used extensively on
satelites already in orbit. And about the pollution/'exhaust' ... what
Giorgis said.
ION drives   (09/21/07 - 13:00 - by J. Tiberius)
Shatner, we have ion drives already. There were first used on the
Pioneer spacecraft.
this is an interesting proposal. You could
conceivably add multiple rockets to attain higher speeds.
I long-ago proposed   (09/21/07 - 14:11 - by Steve Schaper)
An inertial confinement version of this, using linear accelerators to
collide the pellets. For higher thrust, inject water vapor from water
tanks - instant plasma mass increase.

VASMiR is great, except that
you spend 3 months in the van Allan belts. This is not good for
humans, nor, presumably, for electronics.

VASMiR plus something
like this or my own proposal from before the WWW, or the
Bussard-Farnsworth fusion reactor, would be very nice.

The laser
system has nice trip times and ISP, but will the beam diverge enough
to not be a lethal hazard at multiple astronomical units? At least to
telescope sensors?

Projectiles someone mentions? These would be
highly ionized atoms, not pellets. . .The magnetic nozzle protects the
spacecraft from much of the radiation. Air and water are excellent
insulators, and can be used as reaction mass for when you want more
thrust and don't need the maximum ISP - for example, getting through
the van Allan belts.
you guys miss the point   (09/21/07 - 14:32 - by David)
Yea, burning this in space won't be an eco disaster. the issue is
getting the fission materials into orbit. Think Challenger with
nuclear fallout.
Week of Wonders   (09/21/07 - 14:50 - by Inky)
Okay, we've got energy from salt water, photonic propulsion and now a
revamp of Orion. Can we stop the *&%#ing Iraq War and get into space
already?
Space Pollution   (09/21/07 - 16:23 - by Frank Glover)
I suspect that the exhaust velocity will be greater than solar escape
velocity. Meaning, it'll dispose of itself in the most complete and
safe way one could possibly hope, steadily dispersing into
interstellar space. (and no, the exhaust isn't going to be constantly
pointed at Earth, either)
half-assed   (09/21/07 - 16:48 - by bw)
#1 - the sun does emit more radiation than we could ever hope to do
ourselves. those who have stated this are correct.

#2 - the rest
of you morons are not even beginning to grapple w/ the big picture:
there are lots of "projectiles" floating around in space. we can not
have a vehicle travel at the 10% light speed w/ humans onboard w/o the
vehicle being protected by some kind of shield. we don't need to
shields to protect us from Klingons or Vogons, we need them to prevent
the spacecraft hull from being ripped to shreds by some tiny particle
moving towards us at insane speed while we are travelling towards it
at 10% light speed. until this technology is developed the materials
available to us on earth & the science of those materials will prevent
us from sending a craft of this kind anywhere.

you all watch too
much TV. read a book.
3 months in VA?!   (09/21/07 - 17:07 - by Captain Cracksmoke)
@Steve Schaper

Maybe I'm missing something here...why would it be
necesary to spend 3 months in the Van Allen Belt?
Why   (09/21/07 - 22:00 - by MadMax4Real)
for those of you worried about radiation, just take your shirt off
outside for a couple of hours on a sunny day in July. That would
really prove you are true morons. Without a release of the burden on
this planet by mankind, we are doomed in 50-60 years to all die of
radiation when the superpowers finally release their weapons of mass
destruction to "get their share" of the dwindling natural resources of
this planet.

But I forget your morons so nothing a man of sense or
reason says will change your minds. MOROS
This is the best concept yet.   (09/22/07 - 2:46 - by Ruri)
This is exactly what we been looking for in a propulsion system for
manned mission to the planets.
It's a high thrust SSME level and high
ISP system exactly what is needed for a manned mission to mars this is
an enabling
technology.
As for radiation it makes very little also
space already is very radioactive esp when the sun has a CME plus the
always present GCR from super novas.
Also the exhaust products leave
the engine at solar escape velocity.
As for anti nuclear views well
no nuclear power in space you simply can't do any human missions
beyond the moon or close NEOs.
Orion not a solution but   (09/22/07 - 9:54 - by mthomas)
another road block to finding one.

When any bogus technology is
floating in the public especially when it takes limited funding
resources away from other possble more ingenious methods of space
propulsion.

Humanity looses. This technology is not self
replenishing, ejects nuclear matter that is radioactive into space
leaving a readioactive trail where ever it goes.

Maybe this trail
could be the Chisholm trail to Mars. Since radioactive half life could
be hundreds or even thousands of years.

I think the futue of man's
safe interplanetary and interstellar travel wil be in jeopardy.

I
propose taking a look at a safer technology that can reach 10% lights
and possbly beyond.

http://nlspropulsion.net
And the NASA Stublebums are in Charge?   (09/22/07 - 11:36 - by Misterfixit)
OH, yes indeed, the same NASA morons who gave us the shuttle and
concomitant disasters, who want to shut down the HST, are now going to
be in charge of an Atomic Spaceship. Hey, get a grip, anytime you put
the Government in charge of ANYTHING they will screw it up. This very
practical and exciting technology will be hosed by NASA and the
lickspittles in Congre$$ before it is even off the drafting table.
Get Real.
lah dee dah   (09/23/07 - 9:33 - by Anon)
It would be good, just not as good as the positron engine. To Mars and
back in three months, gotta be faster then the 10% this thing can do.
This this type should just be for like, mail delivery when we have
colonies on other planets.
Thank the heavens.....   (09/23/07 - 9:35 - by Anon)
NASA sucks now.
But thank the heavens for private space flight
companies.
Start thinking big picture   (09/23/07 - 11:11 - by Michael)
Large government funded organisations such as NASA need to start
cutting through the red tape and construct "outposts" for orbits
around other planets & moons.
These outposts can contain storage for
fuel, food, water, oxygen and perhaps spare parts.
Unmanned loads can
be sent to these outposts years in advance, perhaps even during
planning stages of manned missions to outer space.
This will mean
less reliance on efficiency in the short term, burn more, for longer,
get to mars or Io and refuel, burn hard and get home early.
If your
interested in a few concepts on deep space chartering email me at
naz2421@hotmail.com
Oh and for the greenies, if the west does not
continue to invest in technology, other emerging economies will surely
fill the void left behind. Surely I do not need to explain the
consequences of what that would bring upon life as we know it.
Please
do not be naive regarding progress, you are likely in front of your
computer reaping the fruits of your forefathers now.
minimag   (09/23/07 - 15:18 - by thedragon2007)
Pure wonderment. I can\'t wait until i\'m ravelling through space and
can see the planets of our solar system. This just be the engine to
do it.
What i see   (09/23/07 - 15:41 - by thedragon2007)
Its pretty clear that the full concept of what the Mini-Mag offers is
not appreciated in all forums here. Thats cool. I love the Mini-mag
as a type of nacel. a couple of these of a suacer section would make
a pretty space craft i think. A constructed saucer section on the
moon from remote stations there. A teradome or 2 for habitation with
magnetic constrictors for artificial gravity. A saucer section that
links up with a few properly placed Mini-Mags for propulsion and you
can set out for the original star trek's warp factor 1. Shields are
absolutely necessary to prevent gamma radiation and we will need
enertial dampeners. An orbiting space station would be nice but we
have one in the moon. Colonizing the moon is our best bet. It has no
atmosphere and offers little protection from the sun but it does on
the darkside and thats a good staging ground for intersolar system
travel. As for laser travel...well...maybe its a good theroy but we
haven't got anything to protect us.
space voyage   (09/23/07 - 22:13 - by garret wang)
how about we invest our resources in perfecting trans-warp? or
dabbling in a slip-stream drive. damn, we\'re never going to leave
the alpha quadrant.
Space Propulsion in General   (09/25/07 - 0:17 - by Outreach)
Im sorry but I feel there is a greater picture that all it seems here
are ignoring. Its not the fact that space travel is and will be the
destiny of the human race, but perhaps we are not looking at the
"bigger picture"

The greater question is not whether a viable space
propulsion system is within our grasp but as the human race goes are
we even ready for this leap? Think about it there are so many worried
about pollution and the ramifications in space. Well any educated
person can tell you that there is more radiation and pollution from
stars and that WE THE HUMAN RACE are more a pollution threat than
space is.

But the truth is we are NOT ready for space travel,
there is no great commitment to it, no national or internatonal
agreements, and very little private interest. Inevitably space travel
will happen but only when the human race commits itself AS A RACE!!!
Not NASA not Microsoft or whoever, as a people venturing out forward
with a common goal.
The Human Race   (09/25/07 - 15:04 - by the dragon)
So it would seem we aren't ready to explore our solar system or as
Garrick puts it our alpha quadrant. lol. It can be discouraging to
view our progress from the back of the room but there is more to ur
space program than meets the eye. Yes, we are a species of waste
product and space doesn't lend any help in that area but we are more
than the sum of our parts. We have dreams and ambition and most
notably a people of faith however misplaced it may seem at times.
Keep in mind our goals for space travel are for a common good. It is
through space travel afterall that we have come to understand our
planet dynamics after all. Keep a faith in our finest minds and DAWN.
Propulsion advances are miniscule compared to the grand scale asked
of us but as humans we have to keep to a goal of betterment that we
might not see in our life time but can pass on. There is honor and
contribution in that. let us not forget the vision Gene Rodenberry
has had. Its worthy and worth while.
Awesome   (09/25/07 - 17:32 - by jmx717)
..but dont we already have the Ion drive?

Remember Deep Space 1?
That mission was sweet!
mini-mag   (09/25/07 - 23:55 - by howacha@yahoo.com)
Finally! We can build a fleet of garbage scows to off-world everything
we dislike, till we are twinkie-perfect. We can go to Saturn and
bolo-plunge ice mountains from the rings into the Moon for water, bag
the Moon 14lbs -just like home- by spinning clear plastic fabric from
both poles\' air-locks, till they meet at the equator and are sealed.
Sunlight does the rest, heating/melting the ice into atmosphere. Just
clip on wings and fly around. Geriatric hospitals anyone? Christians
could migrate offworld to the New Frontier, avoiding constant bigoted
bashing by Self Validators, nervous about hearing proofs against
random creation. The Book of Hebrews mention of \"worlds\" validates
the Mission -and what is the penumbra emanating from the fact of
gravity defying feet, anyway! If not spiritual eminant domain to go to
the New Moon. Just another page in His Story, \"One small radioactive
step for a man, one giant bleat for help to a kind, loving, patient,
\'Make-it-all-good-again-Daddy\'\", later
No unanimous proclamation   (09/26/07 - 0:31 - by tagnikzuur)
"But the truth is we are NOT ready for space travel,
there is no
great commitment to it, no national or internatonal
agreements, and
very little private interest. Inevitably space travel
will happen but
only when the human race commits itself AS A RACE!!!
Not NASA not
Microsoft or whoever, as a people venturing out forward
with a common
goal."

The sad part about that point of view---from my point of
view is that an overwhelming concencus like that will not happen
during the lifetime of our fair planet because there will always be
those who have their own best interests at heart and will let the rest
of humanity be damned before they change their view. Of course, this
is their right no matter what country they come from. The bottom line
is that we, as a species, need to worry about not only our ultimate
survival but thriving far into the future; waiting for everyone to say
"Yes, we should go and settle space" is more pie-in-the-sky than the
realization of warp drive.
Gene ain't here no more   (09/26/07 - 0:43 - by tagnikzuur)
To Garret Wang, I\'d like to remind him---if he\'s ever taken a basic
physics course---that just strapping twenty or so of these MMO\'s to a
ship\'s hull is NOT going to usher in an age of warp-driven ships.
According to E=mc2, the closer you get to the speed of light, the more
mass you\'ll gain; the more mass, the more power you need to propel
your ship faster still. Of course, this is also NOT taking into
account the mass of the MMO\'s themselves which increases the mass
even more. Just because they MIGHT be ableto push a ship to 0.1c does
NOT mean that firing up two or three dozen of them will get you
warping across the galaxy. If you are truly interested in learning
more about REAL FTL theory, enter the name Burkhard Heim and read
about his VERY radical theories of hyperspace travel and a
twelve-dimensional universe. If Heim\'s theory hold water---and there
is at least SOME evidence it does---it could shake up the scientific
community even more than Galileo ever did.
Advanced Propulsion   (09/27/07 - 16:07 - by Frank Glover)
"..but dont we already have the Ion drive?"

For some time now, but
there have been some recent and signifigant advances there,
too:

http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/pro/pp/DS4G/background.htm

http:
//www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/pro/pp/DS4G/DS4G%20Test%20campaign.html

http:
//www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=3130

http://www.aiaa.
org/aerospace/images/articleimages/pdf/AA_Mar06_IB.pdf

http://esamu
ltimedia.esa.int/docs/gsp/completed/C19255ExS.pdf

Picture Of The Day
Deep Water Offshore Wind Turbine
Deep Water Offshore Wind Turbine

Site Of The Week
Darwin Day Celebration
Darwin Day Celebration

Personal Column
Orffyreus and Leibniz - Part 2
Ran Levi
Orffyreus and Leibniz - Part 2

Book Review
The Bomb that Never Was
The Bomb that Never Was




Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Site Profile
Copyright © 2007 The Future of Things. All rights reserved.